By Gerald Cowan
“Join the church of your choice.”
The determinative word there is not join or choice. It
is your. Not something someone else chooses for you or
imposes upon you (such as communism, which is not really
‘government of the people, by the people, and for the
people” as in democracy). As Adolf Hitler mandated a
Volkswagen (literally “people’s car”) so certain countries
have mandated a “state religion” (such as Islamic,
Christian, Catholic, Buddhist, etc) or a “national church”
(such as Church of England, Church of Sweden, etc). There’s
a world-wide phenomenon in nominal Christianity: the
creation and proliferation of churches to meet the
requirements and desires of the people who will be members
in the so-called “purpose-driven” churches where members
determine what the church will be and do – these could be
called “churches of the people, for the people, and by
the people.” What are the premises, purposes, and promises
of such a “people’s church?”
Some churches are formed to protest
against some other church or religious group. They are
commonly labeled as “Protestants,” and they began as a
protest against Catholicism, which they feel is not fully or
properly Christian. Some are formed to be more exclusive;
each one characteristically views itself as “the only true
church.” Others are formed to be more inclusive; they view
themselves as ecumenical, promoting unity in diversity. Some
are organized around a particular doctrinal viewpoint, such
as Sabbath or Seventh-day, Presbyter-ruled, emphasizing a
certain Method of baptism, initiation, worship, or concept
of God – variations and excuses for them seem endless and
numberless. The concept of the “purpose driven” churches and
members is still popular.
Shamefully some are constantly shifting
the boundaries and the goal posts of the church to
accommodate cultural and ethnic factors (not Biblical). As
Neil Armstrong famously said in July 1969, as ostensibly the
first human to step on the moon, “That’s one small step for
a man, a giant leap for mankind,” when stepping on the
moon, some insist now that every cultural shift – such as
“gay liberation” and the embrace of gender variations – is a
giant leap forward for mankind (in truth such things are a
giant step backwards, a retreat into abysmal ignorance and
darkness and a repudiation of truth). So, to appease
our cultural and ethnic tension we are accosted by black
church, white church, indigenous church, gay, transgender or
non-binary church, messianic Jewish church, etc, etc –
ad infinitum ad nauseum. Some want to provide a “one size
fits all” church – a “Community Church” – where
every person can feel he or she belongs and is welcomed into
a loose coalition rather than strict doctrinal or creedal
exclusivity. It is assumed that man himself determines and
adjusts all things to suit himself and to judge whether
anything meets his current desires and values. It is assumed
that man himself is able to shape his own life and destiny,
therefore religion must evolve to accommodate man’s evolving
nature and evolving culture – man must build himself a
church that “meets his needs.” Protagoras was a 5th
Century BC pre-Socratic Greek philosopher. He created a
major controversy during ancient times through his statement
that, “Man is the measure of all things,” interpreted by
Plato to mean there is no absolute objective truth. Whatever
individuals deem to be the truth is true – man by man
himself is judged, each person’s judgment of himself is the
only valid one. This concept is popular today: whatever you
believe is “your truth” and is valid for you – let your
conscience be your guide and ignore those who disagree with
you. The New Testament of the Bible, being about 2,000 years
old, is not “new” enough – God and His Bible need an update.
How arrogant is man! But. . . .
. . . . Without a valid existing
all-knowing God who presents and upholds absolute truth any
church or any religion is invalid and irrelevant. Islam
claims Allah is God – some nominal Christians foolishly
believe and claim Allah and the God of the Bible are one and
the same, that Allah is simply God by another name. But the
Bible clearly states that is a lie. The first three of the
ten commandments assert that there is but one God and His
people must not countenance any others (Exodus 20:1-7). The
Jews knew that the Lord our God is one, and there is no
other – He alone is to be worshipped and served (Deuteronomy
6:1-5). The same is true for Christians – all supposed gods
other than the God of the Bible are idols, no matter who
believes in them and acknowledges them (1 Corinthians
8:1-6). Buddhism has no god(s) – Gautama Buddha
himself was/is not a god. Some claim to honor all gods and
are willing to accommodate any new deities that may be
invented, as for example in Hinduism, the Masonic Lodge,
etc. Catholicism and all of so-called Christendom
claim to honor the God of the Judeo-Christian Bible.
But that necessarily raises the question: Does God
accept and approve all or any of them? Since they all
differ in some ways they cannot all be valid, accepted and
approved by God. Unless the Lord God builds the house those
who build it labor in vain (Psalm 127:1). As co-workers with
God we are to build up the house of God, the church of the
Lord (1 Timothy 3:15, 1 Corinthians 3:9-15, 2 Corinthians
6:1-3).
HOW CAN WE BUILD UP THE BETTER CHURCH?
Obviously we cannot hope to build
something better than what the Lord himself has built and
established for us. Making up something more compatible with
the personal preferences and desires of those who attend
cannot please God if it differs from His will and plan and
stipulation. I have noticed that most of us are
concerned about any wolves that may be threatening the
church, but we do not recognize all of them because they
have learned they are easily detected when they come dressed
as sheep. Currently many of the shepherds (pastors and
overseers, leaders of the flock) are wolves – they are much
more effective as shepherds than they could ever be as
member sheep mingling with the true sheep of the true
Shepherd.
The Lord has built and is building His
house, the church. As noted, if He does not build it those
who do try to build it or one to replace it are
laboring in vain (Psalm 127:1a). Remember that it is
intended to be the Lord’s church, not yours or mine or ours.
We must build upon the foundation of the
Lord himself as laid by his chosen apostles (Ephesians
3:20), upon the words the Lord himself has delivered, not
upon the words of men about His words and sometimes
interpreting his words in such ways as to pervert His
message (Matthew 15:3 and 9, Galatians 1:6-9). No
self-proclaimed preacher, prophet, or pope can claim
to know the mind of God better than the Holy Spirit-guided
men chosen by the Lord to speak for Him. Silver and golden
tongued orators are no better than cardboard bells and dry
clattering sticks pretending to be oracles of God (1 Peter
4:11) unless they faithfully present the Lord’s words. You
can’t build up the Lord’s house by hanging your own portrait
in it.
Have we forgotten the motto about calling
Bible things by Bible names and doing Bible things in Bible
ways? Why hesitate to speak where the Bible speaks and
keep silent where the Bible is silent?
Why are we so concerned with the looks
and décor of the building in which we meet and so little
concerned about what is said and done in the building?
That’s a bit like insisting on a genuine leather cover and
gilded edges of the pages in the Bible but not knowing what
is said in it. The container cannot be more important than
the contents. We are not called upon to build a better
building but rather to build up those who meet in it. The
people, not the building, are the church. We are to build
each other up in the most holy faith (Jude 20).
We build up the church by showing
ourselves to be faithful members of it, sharing the Lord,
sharing the word of the Lord, sharing fellowship in the
Lord, sharing love in the Lord, and being holy people by the
Lord’s definition (Galatians 5:22-26, 2 Peter 1:2-12).
Be the people of God in deed and truth, not only in words –
what you are usually speaks more forcefully than what you
say.
To outsiders emphasize more what the Lord
can and will do for them than what they can do for Him. To
the insiders, the members, emphasize what they can do
for each other but especially for the Lord and for His
church.
- Gerald Cowan, a longtime preacher and missionary, is
retired from full-time pulpit preaching. Gerald publishes an
e-mail newsletter entitled GERALD COWAN’S PERSONAL
PERIODICAL WRITINGS. He is available for Gospel Meetings and
he may be contacted at Geraldcowan1931@aol.com