By Lee Moses
Sometimes questions
arise as to whether is is Scripturally necessary, or
even Scripturally permissible, to “place membership”
with a congregation. A modern brother or
sister may raise the objection: “I’m a member
of the church of Christ, and that’s good enough for
me.” What this person means is: “I am a
member of the universal church of Christ, but I have
no interest in serving in a local
congregation.” Others seem to believe that
placing membership is a denominational concept,
rather than a Scriptural concept. However, the
term simply means to identify oneself with a local
congregation.
Please consider a few
reasons why it is both Scripturally permissible and
Scripturally necessary to place membership with a
faithful church of Christ after leaving another.
1. In the New Testament, each first century
Christian is understood to be a member of a
particular congregation. The New Testament
does speak of the universal church of Christ, into
which the Lord adds the saved when they are baptized
(Matt. 16:18; Acts 2:47; Eph. 5:23).
However, far and away, the New Testament most often
uses “church” to refer to the local congregation
(Acts 14:27; 20:17; Rom. 16:1,
23a). Paul wrote “saints which are at Ephesus”
(Eph. 1:1). Here it is expressed that he wrote
to “saints,” or Christians – but were they not
saints who were members of the local church at
Ephesus? He wrote “unto the church of God
which is at Corinth, to them that are sanctified in
Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in
every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our
Lord” (I Cor. 1:2). “Paul, and Silvanus, and
Timotheus, unto the church of the Thessalonians
which is in God the Father and in the Lord Jesus
Christ” (I Thes. 1:1). Whether Paul addressed
“the saints at [whatever location]” or “the church
at [whatever location],” he was addressing the same
group.
2. Members are responsible to function within the
body (Rom. 12:5; I Cor. 12; Eph. 4:16),
and the body functions within each local
congregation. There is no larger
organizational structure of the church (compare with
Phil. 1:1). If we do not function within
a local church, we do not function within the
church at all.
3. Christians have the responsibility to submit to a
local eldership…, while each eldership has the
responsibility to oversee the flock they are among
(Heb. 13:17; Acts 20:28; I Pet.
5:2). If one never submits to an eldership, he
never complies with his responsibility to submit to
an eldership, and he hinders elders from performing
their responsibility to oversee the flock.
4. After Saul was converted and returned to
Jerusalem, he knew he had to identify himself with
the congregation there. This is why “he
assayed to join himself to the disciples” there
(Acts 9:26). There is no difference between
this and what is sometimes called “placing
membership.” If Saul saw the need to identify
himself with a faithful congregation where he was
living, why would we not have the same need?
If one lives in an area where there are no faithful
congregations, placing membership is obviously not
an option. In such instances, one should again
do what the first century Christians did, and
establish congregations in those areas (compare with
Acts 8:4ff; 11:19-21).
Otherwise, placing
membership is both Scripturally permissible and
Scripturally
necessary.
- via The Central Message, the weekly bulletin of
the Central Church of Christ in Paducah KY.
Jim Faughn serves as an elder and preacher for the
congregation. He may be contacted through the
congregation's website at:
http://www.centralchurchofchrist.org
No comments:
Post a Comment