Sunday, January 22, 2023

Peace In Your Personal Life

By Brian Mitchell

 

    The following story was run a number of years ago in the Fort Worth, Texas Star Telegram. “The man who spotted targets for American bombers over Hiroshima in August 1945 has been laid to rest in Texas soil after searching the last 33 years for some peace in his life. Claude Robert Earthley was a 24 Year Air Force pilot who picked out Hiroshima through a hole in the clouds and radioed the Enola Gay to bomb her primary targets. He died this past Saturday from cancer in the Veterans Administration Hospital in Houston.

    He had been discharged from the service in 1947 following numerous psychiatric tests that indicated severe neurosis and guilt complex. Doctors said that he told him that he felt personally responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Japanese. In 1960, after a series of small time burglaries, the Van Alstyne, Texas, native told reporters that he had not had any sleep in 15 years. There is no peace, he said.”

    One of the primary definitions for the word peace was an “inner calm or tranquility.” Inner peace is something that all men search for, and yet for various reasons, few ever really find it. There are many people in the world and some in the Lord’s Church as well that struggle, as Mr. Earthley did, with their own personal demons and thus they never really enjoy the peace the God intends for all of our lives—Jn.14:1-3, Jn.14:27, Jn.16:33.

    If God intended for us to have peace in our lives and Jesus says repeatedly that it is peace that we have in Him; why do so many people live lives characterized by anything but peace? Some people don’t have peace in their lives because they have never come to the only real source of peace in our lives and that is God. In fact, there is no peace in life a part from God, and if you are here today and have never obeyed the Gospel you should not have peace in your life.

    The real question though is this; why do so many Christians live lives without peace? How about you?

- Brian Mitchell serves as a minister with the Jackson Church of Christ in Jackson, MO. He may be contacted through the congregation's website at https://www.jacksonchurchofchrist.net


Jonah And The Love Of God

By Joe Slater

 

    Before you criticize Jonah too severely, put yourself in his place. God commanded him to preach to Nineveh, the capital of the Assyrian empire. Assyria was a fierce and dreaded enemy of Israel. I could make you nauseous with details of the Assyrians’ cruelty to their enemies. The worse the pain they could inflict and the longer they could make it last, the better they liked it. No doubt Jonah would have been happy for God to wipe them from the face of the earth. Good riddance!

    How would you react if God told you to go preach to Pyongyang (North Korea, ruled by Kim Jong-un)? Or to Kabul (Afghanistan, ruled by the Taliban)? Or to ISIS in parts of Syria? Jonah’s assignment had much in common with those.

    Jonah was wrong to disobey God. Let there be no doubt about that! Jonah’s nationalism kept him from understanding God’s love for even the worst of sinners. God’s nature doesn’t change. Today He isn’t willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance (2 Peter 3:9); that was true in Jonah’s day too. The sheer ignorance of the Assyrians didn’t excuse their hideous abuses, but it did result in the Lord being longsuffering with them even as He was with Israel and still is with us.

    Can you love people who hate you and would be all too happy to kill you if they could? Jesus prayed for the very people who were mocking and murdering Him. A few weeks later His blood cleansed some of them from their sins!

    God loves the good and the evil, the just and the unjust, His love is perfect (complete, mature, Matthew 5:43-48). It’s nothing special to love those who love you (v. 46). But loving your enemies makes you like God.

- Joe Slater serves as minister of the Church of Christ in Justin, TX. He may be contacted through the congregation's website: http://justinchurchofchrist.com


One Nation Under God

By Clifton Angel

 

    What if you could live in a nation whose foundation was built upon God? What if you could live in a nation whose primary leader was completely submissive to God? What if you could live in a nation whose laws were always truly good and right? What if you could live in a nation whose justice system was entirely upright? What if you could live in a nation whose good citizens always looked to God? A nation whose education system relied on the Bible? A nation where life was sacred? A nation where the leaders truly sought the best for the citizens? A nation that cared most about things Biblical, instead of things political? As much as this may seem like a fantasy, it is actually a reality.

 

Peter wrote these words to members of the body of Christ:

"Ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy

nation, a peculiar people; that ye should show forth the

praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his

marvelous light" (1 Peter 2:9).

Figuratively, the Lord's church is a nation, which must shine as a light to all physical nations. Paul said,

"Do all things without murmurings and disputings: That ye

may be blameless and harmless, the sons of God, without

rebuke, in the midst of a crooked and perverse nation, among

whom ye shine as lights in the world" (Philippians 2:14–15).

The Psalmist proclaimed,

"Blessed is the nation whose God is Jehovah, The people

whom he hath chosen for his own inheritance" (Psalm 33:12,

ASV).

In his first epistle, Peter said it this way, concerning the church,

"Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ,

which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us

again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ

from the dead, To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled,

and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you" (1:3–4).

    If you are in Christ's kingdom (Acts 2:37–47; Colossians 1:13)—an holy nation—you are in: (1) A nation whose foundation is built upon God! (2) A nation whose primary leader is completely submissive to God (Jesus)! (3) A nation whose laws are always truly good and right! (4) A nation whose justice system is entirely upright! (5) A nation whose good citizens always look to God! (6) A nation whose education system relies on the Bible! (7) A nation where life is sacred! (8) A nation where the leaders truly seek the best for the citizens! (9) A nation that cares most about things Biblical, instead of things political!

 

Are you in the church that belongs to Christ—the one nation that is willingly under God?

Our citizenship is in heaven; whence also we wait for a Savior,

the Lord Jesus Christ (Philippians 3:20).

- Clifton Angel preaches for the Coldwater Church of Christ in Coldwater, MS. He may be contacted through that congregation's website: http://www.coldwatercofc.com/


Are You Intolerant?

By Jeff Arnette

 

    We live in a world where it is an unforgivable sin is to be intolerant of others. What is often shocking is that those same people who are quick to point out that someone is being “intolerant” are themselves incredibly intolerant of others. They seem to be tolerant of almost anything except Christian values or someone who disagrees with them. As soon as someone disagrees with their opinions or says they are a Christian they’re instantly labeled as intolerant, bigoted, racist, or legalistic.

    I think we need to define this word tolerance. The worldly definition of tolerance seems to be “accepting all views as true.”[i] Whereas, Oxford’s dictionary says “showing tolerance (of a plant, animal, or machine), able to endure specified conditions or treatment.”[ii] Webster’s defines tolerance as “tolerating or being tolerant, especially of the beliefs and customs of others, even though these are not like your own.” Therefore, to tolerate means to allow, permit, or recognize and respect others’ beliefs and customs without sharing them.[iii]

    Is tolerance really about just accepting all viewpoints as correct? Does God really expect me to just accept someone’s view as true, just because they believe it to be true? Honestly, I can hold to all kinds of ideas about all kinds of things, but just because they are my views does not make them right. Obviously if I hold a certain view, I believe it to be right but am I really, correct?

    I think this gets to the real problem most have with tolerance. We live in a world that does not want anyone to tell them they are wrong. Friends, the Bible I read says that I cannot just accept everything as true. God expects His followers to question all things (1 Thess. 5:21) and hold to the good. The very words good and bad or right and wrong imply that some things are right and others wrong.

    To make matters worse, the way most people throw around the accusation of intolerance violates a simple principle of logic. The principle states that if you are presented with two contradictory statements there can only be three logical options. One is right and the other is wrong or both statements are wrong. We cannot accept that all contradictory views are correct. We can speculate all day about what we think or even what we want to be true but there is only one truth. For example, if Jesus is not the only way to heaven (John 14:6) then what is the right way?

    So, are you intolerant of other’s beliefs simply because they differ from yours? I don’t think so. Excuse me but I thought we lived in a country where having an opinion was ok or even desirable. I’m afraid we’re inching closer and closer to a society where the majority rules and if you disagree you will be censored, silenced, or discredited until no one listens to you any longer.

    For the Christian, the Bible is very clear on this. I must differentiate between what is good and what is bad. But in the process, I cannot forget that the same Bible tells me to treat people fairly, to love them, and to try to help them find the truth about God and salvation. True tolerance does not require you to be ignorant and blind to the truth.

 

[i] Ted Cabal, Chad Owen Brand, E. Ray Clendenen, Paul Copan, J.P. Moreland and Doug Powell, The Apologetics Study Bible: Real Questions, Straight Answers, Stronger Faith (Nashville, TN: Holman Bible Publishers, 2007). 1882.

 

[ii] Catherine Soanes and Angus Stevenson, Concise Oxford English Dictionary, 11th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).

 

[iii] Hindson, E., & Caner, E. (2008). The popular encyclopedia of apologetics: surveying the evidence for the truth of christianity. Harvest House Publishers.

- Jeff Arnette preaches for the Central Haywood church of Christ, Clyde, NC.  He may be contacted through the congregation's website: https://centralhaywoodcoc.com/


Sunday, January 15, 2023

Introduction to 3 John

By Jeff Arnette

 

    At just 219 words, 3 John is the shortest book in the entire Bible. The size and them of 3 John is like 2 John. Both letters were written by the apostle John who is called “the elder” (v. 3). The sense of appreciation for their “children walking in truth” (vv. 3-4) also resonates in both letters. And, of course, both letters include warnings against church leaders who would deceive and abuse the church members.

    Just like 2 John, this letter has all the attributes of a typical letter of its time. It is very personal in its tone and feel, yet it challenges its readers to stand up for the truth and follow the example of those who are exemplifying Christlikeness. The problem the church is dealing with was leaders who are using the church to gain power and control over others.

    The purpose of 3 John is clearly to advise a dear friend and fellow Christian leader about how to deal with a troublemaker named “Diotrephes.” He was trying to gain and retrain power over the church by limiting their expose to other preachers and teachers.

    3 John was written to man named “Gaius” and dealt with the specific problems in the church. The date for the letter seems to be like 2 John which is around AD 90. At its heart, 3 John gives us a contrast between two church leaders and their hearts. The first is “Gaius” (vv. 1-8), who is the main recipient of the letter. In 3 John, John elevates the leadership and ministry of Gaius as faithful. He even said that Gaius was deserving of a good reputation in the church.

    The other leader “Diotrephes”, who longed for first place in the church, was standing against him and his ministry. Instead of welcoming traveling preachers and supporting them in their work he wanted to isolate the church members from anyone who would teach them something else. He worked against Gaius but also anyone in the church who tried to do what was right. John insinuated that he would deal with Diotrephes personally if and when he came to visit them.

    Two themes stand out in 3 John. First is the lesson on practicing hospitality to those doing the Lord’s word. The two men stand in contrast here set an example of what to do and what to avoid. Gaius made it a habit of welcoming these people and meeting theirs needs. Diotrephes, on the other hand, worked against them and anyone who wanted to support and encourage them. In his misguided attempts to gain power and influence, John rebukes his actions and warns him of coming judgment.

    Second, John points out the example of Gaius as a true leader worthy of being followed while Diotrephes was to be avoided. Interestingly, John praises both men for their service in the church. This echoes the lessons Jesus taught about true greatness was found in humility and service to others.

    Let me encourage you to read this great little book again and consider for yourself how it applies to your life.

- Jeff Arnette preaches for the Central Haywood church of Christ, Clyde, NC.  He may be contacted through the congregation's website: https://centralhaywoodcoc.com/


Second Chances

By David A. Sargent

 

    I have known and respected Neal Pollard since we were classmates at Faulkner University in the 1980s.  I did not know until recently of what he calls his “second chance.”  Here is part of his story:

    We were living in Cairo, Georgia, and I was in the third grade.  It was during a game of kickball on the playground and I was the "pitcher."  A kid kicked it hard and I caught it.  As the ball hit me in the gut, I felt a sharp pain.  Something wasn't right.  My parents took me that week to see the local doctor.  He thought it might be a hernia.  Exploratory surgery in Thomasville instead revealed a tumor on my liver.  My parents and I flew to Atlanta, Georgia, where I was checked into Egleston Children's Hospital.  Extensive testing there and in Emory Hospital, the general campus for Egleston, led my team of doctors to the same conclusion: it was cancerous.  They tried to prepare my parents for how slim my chance of survival was.  Even if their diagnosis was wrong, surgery and attending blood loss may well be more than I could stand.  My parents maintained great faith, and my dad solicited prayers from congregations all over the place.  [After the surgery], Dr. Gerald Zwiren, who led a team of highly-skilled doctors, brought the news to my parents that I survived the surgery and later shared the oncology report that my tumor was benign.  That was close to 40 years ago and to this point I have never had further complications.  I certainly received a second chance.

    Periodically, I ponder at length what I have done with that second chance.  The scar I bear from that surgery has long since become invisible to my daily view.  I suffer no lingering consequences.  That event is certainly not why I chose to become a preacher, as if to try and pay a debt to God for saving me.  Sadly, despite His mercy in sparing me, I have sinned in ways great and small that reveal, in addition to all else, a failure to appreciate that blessing.  Spiritually, whether as a preacher, husband, father, or Christian, I am saddled with the realization of how far I have to go.  With the help of His Word, His providence, and His strength, I continue to try to make the most of this extra time He gave me back in 1979. *

    Consider a similarity from Neal’s experience to our own condition…

Because of our sins, we find ourselves lost and doomed to destruction.  As Neal writes, “By all human calculations and efforts, nothing could be done to save us.”

    But God loves us so much that He gave His Son Jesus to die for us so that we might have the forgiveness of our sins and receive the gift of eternal life (John 3:16; Romans 6:23).

Although we are lost due to our sins, God gives us “a second chance.”

    God will save and give eternal life to those who place their faith and trust in Jesus (Acts 16:30-31), turn from their sins in repentance (Acts 17:30-31), confess Jesus before men (Romans 10:9-10), and are baptized (immersed) into Christ for the forgiveness of sins (Acts 2:38).  The redeeming blood that Jesus shed on the cross will continue to cleanse those who continue to walk in the light of His Word (1 John 1:7).

    God is the God of second chances.  Take Neal’s words to heart: “You may have messed things up badly in your life.  You may feel that it is impossible for God to love and forgive you.  [But] God is the God of the second chance!  His diagnosis is perfect, and His is the only one that counts!  Trust in the Great Physician.  He has never lost a patient who followed His prescription!”

    Won’t YOU trust and obey the Great Physician and make the most of the “second chance” that He provides in Christ? 

- David A. Sargent, minister for the Church of Christ at Creekwood in Mobile, Alabama, is also the editor of an electronic devotional entitled "Living Water." To learn more about this excellent resource contact David via their website: http://www.creekwoodcc.org

 

* Neal Pollard, “What Do We Make Of God's Second Chances?” in Daily Bread (7/22/15), an e-mail ministry of the Bear Valley church of Christ in Denver, CO, where Neal serves as a Gospel preacher.


Believe

By Clifton Angel

 

    “With God, all things are possible” (Matthew 19:26). However, there is at least one thing that Scripture points out is impossible with God (Note: This is no contradiction; Jesus’ statement must be considered contextually). “Without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him” (Hebrews 11:6). Yes, the impossibility here falls on the burden of the human being. Grammatically, we can change it to say: “It is impossible for God to be pleased with one who is without faith.”

    Why do I need faith? First, it’s impossible to please God without it. Second, “Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen” (Hebrews 11:1).

    How do I obtain faith? “Faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God” (Romans 10:17). Does this mean in order to have Biblical faith, all I have to do is audibly acknowledge God’s Word? Does it mean that I do not have to actually do anything? James says, “Faith without works is dead” (James 2:20, 26). “Show me thy faith without thy works, and I will show thee my faith by my works” (James 2:18). But Paul said all I have to do is hear God’s Word? Yes. Is this a contradiction? No.

    We can see that it is not a contradiction by properly understanding what it means to hear. When a mother says to her daughter: “Go clean your room.” The daughter stays put. And her mom asks, “Did you hear me?” Can the daughter then just say, “Yes, I heard you,” and rightfully continuing doing something other than cleaning her room? Or would her mother discipline her for not really listening? The fact is, we know that “hearing” in that context also requires action. And the same is required in the Romans 10:17 instruction.

    Therefore, believing Biblically is not merely a mental acknowledge of something but acting upon it according to God’s standards. “He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; he that believeth not shall be condemned” (Mark 16:16). Some have asked, “Why Jesus did not say, ‘he that believeth not and is baptized not shall be condemned’?” The answer is found in the definition of belief that we have just discussed. If one does not believe, there is no need for the actions that emanate from belief. A grammatical consideration of Mark 16:16 solidifies its meaning and denies all contradictions. Consider: “He that eats and digests his food will live; he that eats not will die.” If one does not eat, there is no need for digestion. If one does not believe, there is no need for baptism. However, if one believes Jesus, then he will know that he cannot be saved before baptism.

    The need to believe is apparent. Do you believe?

- Clifton Angel preaches for the Coldwater Church of Christ in Coldwater, MS. He may be contacted through that congregation's website: http://www.coldwatercofc.com/